claim · claim_srsc1_no_single_iron_origin
The Caucasian iron transition should not be reduced to one origin centre or one diffusion route.
The Caucasian iron transition should not be reduced to one origin centre or one diffusion route.
Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Evidence and sources
Supporting sources
- supports · supports
Innovation and Adoption of Iron in the Ancient Near East — Nathaniel L. Erb-Satullo (2019)Source linked to claim record claim_srsc1_no_single_iron_origin.
Locator: Regional review and critique of simple diffusion - supports · provides case
Late Bronze and Early Iron Age Copper Smelting Technologies in the South Caucasus: The View from Ancient Colchis c. 1500–600 BC — Nathaniel L. Erb-Satullo, Brian J. J. Gilmour, Nana Khakhutaishvili (2014)Source linked to claim record claim_srsc1_no_single_iron_origin.
Locator: Western Georgian production sequence - supports · provides case
Tli Necropolis — L. PantskavaSource linked to claim record claim_srsc1_no_single_iron_origin.
Locator: Limited early iron and later broad transition
Contradicting sources
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.
Other source context
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.