claim · claim_srsc1_post_srubnaya_reconfiguration_not_replacement
Post-Srubnaya change in the lower Don and Volga should be modeled as regional reconfiguration with continuity and selective mobility, not automatic total replacement.
Post-Srubnaya change in the lower Don and Volga should be modeled as regional reconfiguration with continuity and selective mobility, not automatic total replacement.
Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Evidence and sources
Supporting sources
- supports · provides legacy replacement model
The Closing Phase of the Late Bronze Age on the Lower Don (Sites of the Kobiakovo Culture) — E. S. Sharafutdinova (1975)Source linked to claim record claim_srsc1_post_srubnaya_reconfiguration_not_replacement.
Locator: Migration interpretation - supports · provides regional chronology
Radiocarbon Chronology of the Bilozerka Culture: Based on Barrows near the Village of Zapovitne (the ‘Stepnoy’ Cemetery) — Vitaliy V. Otroshchenko (2003)Source linked to claim record claim_srsc1_post_srubnaya_reconfiguration_not_replacement.
Locator: Bilozerka sequence - supports · supports reconfiguration
Archaeological and Anthropological Aspects of the Study of the Pre-Scythian Burials from the Volga-Don Interfluve — Mariya A. Balabanova, Alexander N. Dyachenko (2024)Source linked to claim record claim_srsc1_post_srubnaya_reconfiguration_not_replacement.
Locator: Recent regional synthesis
Contradicting sources
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.
Other source context
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.