What is the evidence?

observation

By Cypro-Geometric III, surveys and excavations document renewed rural occupation and sanctuary activity in several regions.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

900 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: approximate

moderate

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Interpretation and caveats

The pattern is compatible with expanding local institutions and regional polities, but later city-kingdom borders cannot be inferred directly from sanctuary distributions.

Event context

Classification

Event type: rural reoccupation and sanctuary growth

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly reconstructs a Cypriot site, landscape, institution, community, or chronological transition within the primary interval.

Research notes

  • Documents the renewed visibility. Role: provides synthesis. Locator: CG III settlement and sanctuary trends.
  • Provides one model without precise Bronze Age retrojection. Role: proposes political model. Locator: Iron Age political configuration.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records