What is the evidence?

observation

Dalverzin preserves a large settlement assemblage within the Chust and Early Iron Age sequence.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1400 BCE–900 BCE

Precision: range

low

Working range preserves source uncertainty and should be refined with site-level dates.

Interpretation and caveats

Its scale is significant, but urban, capital and state labels remain unproven and the site must be disambiguated from Bactrian Dalverzin Tepe.

Event context

Classification

Event type: large settlement occupation

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event adds required Ferghana settlement coverage while explicitly controlling a common site-name ambiguity.

Research notes

  • Provides foundational context. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Settlement inventory and regional sequence.
  • Adds economic evidence. Role: provides scientific evidence. Locator: Dalverzin faunal comparison.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records