What is the evidence?

observation

Neo-Assyrian forces invaded Egypt and captured Memphis during conflict with Taharqa.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

671 BCE

Precision: year

high

Preferred display range for this release. It does not suppress model-specific dates, regnal uncertainty or alternative period boundaries recorded elsewhere.

Interpretation and caveats

Assyrian sources attest campaigns and claims, but durable control depended on local rulers, garrisons and renewed intervention.

Event context

Classification

Event type: imperial invasion and intervention

Evidence layer: historical and archaeological

Timeline role: cross regional context

People and places

Locations: Memphis

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly connects Egypt, Kush and the Neo-Assyrian imperial system.

Research notes

  • Attests royal claims and campaign context. Role: provides primary Assyrian evidence. Locator: Esarhaddon royal inscriptions concerning Egypt.
  • Supports imperial context. Role: contextualizes Assyrian imperial practice. Locator: Neo-Assyrian expansion and provincial strategies.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records