What is the evidence?

observation

The Ur III state developed extensive administrative documentation and provincial organization.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

2112 BCE–2004 BCE

Precision: range

high

Preferred display range for this release. It does not suppress model-specific dates, regnal uncertainty or alternative period boundaries recorded elsewhere.

  • supports · provides world context
    History and Philology — Walther Sallaberger, Ingo Schrakamp (editors) (2015)

    Supports broad framing.


    Locator: Ur III chronology and administration

Interpretation and caveats

Included for world comparison during Egypt's First Intermediate to Middle Kingdom transition; no direct institutional borrowing is asserted.

Event context

Classification

Event type: major world context state system

Evidence layer: historical and archaeological

Timeline role: general world context

Why it matters to the timeline

Contemporaneous major state system presented without unsupported causal linkage.

Research notes

  • Supports broad framing. Role: provides world context. Locator: Ur III chronology and administration.

Evidence and sources

  • supports · provides world context
    History and Philology — Walther Sallaberger, Ingo Schrakamp (editors) (2015)

    Supports broad framing.


    Locator: Ur III chronology and administration

Where to go next