What is the evidence?

observation

Later Late Cypriot III levels preserve additional localized destruction, rebuilding, and modification before final contraction.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1160 BCE–1100 BCE

Precision: approximate

moderate

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Interpretation and caveats

The sequence should be modeled as multiple episodes with uncertain cross-site synchronism, not a single second destruction wave.

Event context

Classification

Event type: repeated destruction and rebuilding

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

People and places

Locations: Enkomi

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly reconstructs a Cypriot site, landscape, institution, community, or chronological transition within the primary interval.

Research notes

  • Identifies recurrent disruption and rebuilding. Role: synthesizes site sequence. Locator: Enkomi later transition phases.
  • Provides evidence for continuing institutional practices. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Late Enkomi inscription contexts.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records