What is the evidence?

observation

A deposit of bronze axes was recovered at Bègues in the Allier.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

2200 BCE–1800 BCE

Precision: broad range

moderate

Preferred range used by the event. Plausible bounds and alternative models remain explicit rather than averaged.

Interpretation and caveats

It is retained only as an earlier metallurgical and depositional antecedent named in the brief, not as direct evidence for the 1600-800 BCE sequence.

Event context

Classification

Event type: metal deposit

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The find lies in the modern French search frame and was explicitly named as a starting point, but its explanation marks it as contextual outside the primary interval.

Research notes

  • Primary find publication. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: pp. 245-262.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records