What is the evidence?

observation

Bronze objects from rivers and other wet contexts recur in the Midi-Pyrénées and Garonne evidence base.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1300 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: long duration

moderate

Preferred range used by the event. Plausible bounds and alternative models remain explicit rather than averaged.

Interpretation and caveats

Wet-context finds must be evaluated individually because deliberate deposition, loss, erosion and recovery bias may all contribute.

Event context

Classification

Event type: wet context metal deposition

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event directly covers Aquitaine and southwest deposition practices while preserving recovery-context uncertainty.

Research notes

  • Provides the regional inventory and interpretive method. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: pp. 115-141.
  • Places the pattern in wider chronology. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Atlantic deposition discussion.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records