What is the evidence?

observation

Lake-sediment proxies record increased erosion associated in part with changing agricultural practices in the French Prealps.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1600 BCE–1200 BCE

Precision: broad range

moderate

Preferred range used by the event. Plausible bounds and alternative models remain explicit rather than averaged.

Interpretation and caveats

Agricultural expansion is a plausible contributor, but climatic forcing, fire and local land-use patterns must remain in the causal model.

Event context

Classification

Event type: land use and erosion change

Evidence layer: environmental

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event directly addresses local environmental records and agricultural systems in the Alpine zone.

Alternative interpretations

  • Climate variability may explain part of the erosion signal independently of agricultural change. (moderate confidence)

Research notes

  • Provides the multiproxy erosion analysis. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: pp. 241-249.
  • Provides independent environmental context. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Vegetation and climate sequence.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records