What is the evidence?

observation

Settlement, funerary, material and bioarchaeological evidence indicates movement between valleys, piedmonts, passes and uplands on both sides of the western Pyrenees.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1600 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: long duration

moderate

Preferred range used by the event. Plausible bounds and alternative models remain explicit rather than averaged.

Interpretation and caveats

The pattern supports multiple forms of mobility and seasonal land use without requiring one fixed transhumance system or one migrating population.

Event context

Classification

Event type: seasonal mobility and land use

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

The event directly fulfils the Pyrenean and Iberian connection requirement using evidence from both modern sides of the mountain chain.

Research notes

  • Supports multi-zone mobility and cross-border comparison. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Interdisciplinary synthesis.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records