What is the evidence?

observation

Ramesses II and Hattusili III concluded a treaty preserved in Egyptian and Hittite versions.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1259 BCE

Precision: year with alternative

Chronology model: standard high level regnal conversion

moderate

Preferred range used by the event. Plausible bounds and alternative models remain explicit rather than averaged.

Alternative assertion

1258 BCE

Precision: year

Chronology model: alternative regnal conversion

moderate

Some chronological conversions place the treaty one year later.

Interpretation and caveats

The treaty marks a major diplomatic settlement in the eastern Mediterranean. No connection to France is asserted.

Event context

Classification

Event type: diplomatic treaty

Evidence layer: historical

Timeline role: general world context

Why it matters to the timeline

The treaty helps readers see that major interstate diplomacy followed Kadesh in the wider world, without implying knowledge of or influence on communities in France.

Research notes

  • Provides treaty text and analysis. Role: provides primary evidence. Locator: pp. 179-205.
  • Provides historical framing. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Chapter 6.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records