What is the evidence?

observation

Eastern Sudan’s archaeological sequence shifted from Gash to Jebel Mokram traditions before or near the opening of the primary interval.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1800 BCE–1600 BCE

Precision: broad regional transition

Chronology model: eastern Sudan archaeological sequence

moderate

Regional ceramic and settlement sequences place the transition around the early second millennium BCE, with local variation.

Interpretation and caveats

The transition provides necessary antecedent context for later mobility and pastoral systems. It is not interpreted as a single ethnic replacement or mass migration.

Event context

Classification

Event type: archaeological group transition

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

This antecedent transition materially explains the eastern Sudan communities connected to the Horn and Red Sea during 1600–800 BCE.

Research notes

  • Provides the regional archaeological chronology. Role: dates. Locator: Gash and Jebel Mokram sequence tables and transition discussion.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records