What is the evidence?

observation

Egyptian expeditions used a temporary Red Sea harbour equipped with ship timbers, anchors, storage and imported ceramics.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

2055 BCE–1650 BCE

Precision: period range

Chronology model: Mersa/Wadi Gawasis occupation sequence

high

Excavation places the harbour's main use in the Middle Kingdom, approximately 2055–1650 BCE, before the primary interval.

Interpretation and caveats

The harbour establishes seaborne expedition capability as a direct antecedent. It does not prove the itinerary of later New Kingdom voyages or a permanent port network.

Event context

Classification

Event type: maritime harbour use

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

The antecedent is outside 1600–800 BCE but materially explains the maritime capacity underlying later Egyptian Punt expeditions.

Research notes

  • Provides direct harbour evidence and chronology. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: pp. 4–11; harbour facilities, ship equipment and imported ceramics.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records