What is the evidence?

observation

Many motilla occupations end during the middle of the second millennium BCE, although exact site chronologies and post-abandonment land use differ.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1500 BCE–1300 BCE

Precision: range

moderate

Preferred display range for this release. It preserves BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower samples, phase dates or alternatives listed separately.

Alternative assertion

1400 BCE–1300 BCE

Precision: range

moderate

Some motilla occupations may continue toward c. 1350–1300 BCE; the system did not end everywhere on one date.

Interpretation and caveats

The decline is a regional settlement-system transformation. Climate, hydrology, social organization and changing settlement choices are interacting hypotheses rather than one proven cause.

Event context

Classification

Event type: settlement system decline

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event is required to connect motilla operation to later Meseta sequences without assuming peninsula-wide collapse.

Alternative interpretations

  • Individual motillas may end closer to c. 1350 BCE or have activity extending into later local phases. (moderate confidence)

Research notes

  • Provides the climate-adaptation and terminal discussion. Role: proposes interpretation. Locator: pp. 89–108.
  • Provides site-level chronology and function. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: pp. 241–259.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records