What is the evidence?

observation

Elamite intervention ended the Kassite dynasty and produced a distinct Mesopotamian political transition.

proposed causes

    The dynastic transition is secure; direct southern Levantine causal connection is not demonstrated here.

    Inspect the sources →
    Review and provenance

    Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

    Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

    Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

    Chronology

    Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

    Preferred assertion

    1155 BCE

    Precision: single year approximate

    Chronology model: best current range

    high

    The dynastic transition is secure; direct southern Levantine causal connection is not demonstrated here.

    Interpretation and caveats

    A major contemporaneous Near Eastern political transformation useful for world orientation, not evidence for a single connected invasion or direct cause in the southern Levant.

    Event context

    Classification

    Event type: dynastic and political transition

    Evidence layer: historical

    Timeline role: general world context

    Why it matters to the timeline

    It helps readers see that major political change also occurred in Mesopotamia, while explicitly avoiding an unsupported direct southern Levant connection.

    Alternative interpretations

    • Part of a broad connected systems crisis through trade and diplomatic disruption.
    • A largely separate Mesopotamian dynastic sequence.

    Research notes

    • Provides scholarly world-context synthesis. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Babylonia and successor-state chapters.

    Evidence and sources

    Where to go next

    Referenced records