What is the evidence?

observation

Phoenician inscriptions from Kition securely attest the language in an institutional urban setting by the ninth century BCE.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

900 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

very high

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Alternative assertion

900 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: Kition early Phoenician sequence

very high

Direct language-attestation range, distinct from earlier Levantine material contacts.

  • informs · dates
    Kition in the Tenth to Fourth Centuries B.C. — Marguerite Yon, William A. P. Childs (1997)

    Direct language-attestation range, distinct from earlier Levantine material contacts.


    Locator: Earliest Phoenician inscriptions

Interpretation and caveats

Direct textual evidence provides a firmer threshold for Phoenician presence than earlier imported Levantine objects.

Event context

Classification

Event type: language attestation

Evidence layer: epigraphic and archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly reconstructs a Cypriot site, landscape, institution, community, or chronological transition within the primary interval.

Research notes

  • Provides the direct attestation. Role: provides epigraphic evidence. Locator: Ninth-century inscriptions.
  • Places epigraphy within urban continuity. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Early Iron Age Kition.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records