What is the evidence?

observation

A rich hoard of bronze and precious-metal objects was deposited at a substantial Karpas settlement with broad connections.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1250 BCE–1150 BCE

Precision: approximate

moderate

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Interpretation and caveats

The hoard indicates high-value circulation and local aggregation, but its exact depositional cause, date, ownership, and political meaning remain under publication.

Event context

Classification

Event type: metal hoard deposition

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly reconstructs a Cypriot site, landscape, institution, community, or chronological transition within the primary interval.

Research notes

  • Documents the assemblage and publication status. Role: provides project evidence. Locator: Settlement and hoard summary.
  • Provides a neutral site locator with precision caveats. Role: locates. Locator: Kaleburnu-Kraltepe entry.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records