What is the evidence?

observation

New Kingdom ceramic groups and decorated blocks naming Thutmose III, Horemheb, Ramesses II, and Ramesses IV attest repeated royal and cultic activity at the oasis centre.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1479 BCE–1149 BCE

Precision: range

moderate

This assertion records the event’s preferred range without suppressing narrower samples, phase uncertainty, or competing chronology noted elsewhere in the record.

Interpretation and caveats

Mut el-Kharab was a durable oasis institution connected to Nile Valley administration and desert routes. The evidence supports repeated activity, not uninterrupted direct control of every route.

Event context

Classification

Event type: oasis temple activity

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

This event directly documents the North African research scope in eastern Sahara and oasis corridors, Egypt and western frontier. It is included for its regional evidence rather than merely because it is contemporary.

Research notes

  • Provides New Kingdom phase evidence. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Dataset description; ceramic corpus and royal blocks.
  • Places the evidence in the long-term oasis sequence. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Project history; monuments and route setting.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records