What is the evidence?

observation

Temple deposits, blocks, stelae, ostraka, architecture, and a large ceramic corpus document substantial oasis activity during the Third Intermediate Period.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1070 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

high

This assertion records the event’s preferred range without suppressing narrower samples, phase uncertainty, or competing chronology noted elsewhere in the record.

Interpretation and caveats

Occupation and central interest continued, but administrative control was not necessarily uniform. Local oasis material and religious practices should be represented alongside dynastic connections.

Event context

Classification

Event type: oasis institutional continuity and reorganization

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

This event directly documents the North African research scope in eastern Sahara and oasis corridors, Egypt and western frontier. It is included for its regional evidence rather than merely because it is contemporary.

Research notes

  • Provides Third Intermediate Period activity and regional implications. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Monograph overview; temple evidence and ceramic synthesis.
  • Provides site-specific dynastic and cultic context. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Project history; Dakhleh stelae and monuments.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records