What is the evidence?

observation

Coastal communities repeatedly used the Nafūn complex for marine exploitation, habitation and interaction with inland systems.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1012 BCE–536 BCE

Precision: calibrated range

Chronology model: Nafūn calibrated sequence

high

Published radiocarbon results span approximately 1012–536 cal BCE and cross the release endpoint.

Interpretation and caveats

Nafūn shows coastal expertise and regional connectivity. It does not by itself establish blue-water voyaging or a later classical port system.

Event context

Classification

Event type: coastal subsistence and exchange

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event supplies rare securely dated coastal evidence in Oman and extends slightly beyond 800 BCE as a direct consequence sequence.

Research notes

  • Provides the calibrated range. Role: dates. Locator: Radiocarbon results; 1012–536 cal BCE.
  • Provides the coastal subsistence and inland-link evidence. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Excavation and artefact results.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records