What is the evidence?

observation

A syllabic inscription on a bronze obelos is commonly read as a Greek personal name, Opheltas.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1050 BCE–950 BCE

Precision: range

high

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Alternative assertion

1100 BCE–1000 BCE

Precision: broad range

Chronology model: Early eleventh-century model

moderate

Earlier possible range retained because the burial and object chronology have been placed differently in scholarship.

  • informs · dates
    Cypriot Syllabary — Stephen Colvin (2007)

    Earlier possible range retained because the burial and object chronology have been placed differently in scholarship.


    Locator: Opheltas chronology discussion

Interpretation and caveats

It is an important candidate for the earliest direct Greek-language evidence on Cyprus, but its precise date and palaeographic classification require cautious presentation.

Event context

Classification

Event type: language attestation

Evidence layer: epigraphic and archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly reconstructs a Cypriot site, landscape, institution, community, or chronological transition within the primary interval.

Research notes

  • Supports the language reading and cautions. Role: provides epigraphic synthesis. Locator: Early syllabic Greek and Opheltas.
  • Provides cemetery chronology. Role: provides archaeological context. Locator: Skales burial contexts.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records