What is the evidence?

observation

Eighteen graves document local mortuary practices and material links during the Late Bronze–Early Iron transition.

The grave contexts are published; regional representativeness and exact settlement links remain uncertain.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1400 BCE–900 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: release preferred synthesis

high

Preferred display range synthesized from the cited source roles. It preserves a range and does not imply every component occurred continuously or synchronously.

Interpretation and caveats

The sample is a local cemetery record and should not be scaled automatically to population movement or political control.

Event context

Classification

Event type: cemetery use

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event strengthens the western Azerbaijan and Kura-valley sequence with a published local cemetery.

Research notes

  • Publishes the cemetery sample and chronology. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: pp. 118–129; grave catalogue and regional conclusions.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records