What is the evidence?

observation

Stratified occupation and archaeometric ceramics document local production and changing material traditions on the Erzurum Plain.

The local sequence and ceramic production are well supported; cross-mountain movement remains an inference requiring material matches.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1300 BCE–800 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: release preferred synthesis

high

Preferred display range synthesized from the cited source roles. It preserves a range and does not imply every component occurred continuously or synchronously.

Interpretation and caveats

The site supports local household production and an Anatolian-Caucasian comparison. Its location does not prove it controlled a mountain corridor.

Event context

Classification

Event type: settlement and ceramic transition

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

Sos Höyük lies immediately west of the South Caucasus and materially tests exchange, continuity, and corridor assumptions across northeast Anatolia.

Research notes

  • Provides the settlement transition framework. Role: provides archaeological sequence. Locator: Stratigraphic and chronological discussion.
  • Supports strong local ceramic production. Role: provides archaeometric observation. Locator: Petrographic and geochemical results.
  • Provides a representative point. Role: locates. Locator: Vici record 27442.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records