What is the evidence?

observation

A large fortified enclosure, citadel, and associated settlement formed a major centre on the Tsaghkahovit Plain.

Fortification and occupation are secure; polity and control interpretations remain moderate.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1500 BCE–1200 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: release preferred synthesis

high

Preferred display range synthesized from the cited source roles. It preserves a range and does not imply every component occurred continuously or synchronously.

Interpretation and caveats

The architecture supports collective labour and hierarchy, but the centre's exact political form and territorial reach are unresolved.

Event context

Classification

Event type: fortress construction and occupation

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event directly addresses South Caucasian fortress systems, cyclopean-style architecture, agriculture, and settlement hierarchy.

Research notes

  • Documents the fortress and plain-scale system. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Fortress survey, excavation, and regional settlement sections.
  • Provides current project summary. Role: provides site data. Locator: Site dimensions and Late Bronze Age chronology.
  • Supports site placement. Role: locates. Locator: Published representative coordinates.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records