What is the evidence?

observation

Metals and artefact traditions at Tianshanbeilu show technological links with several eastern and western regions.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1800 BCE–1000 BCE

Precision: range

moderate

Contextual record outside all or part of the primary interval.

Interpretation and caveats

The assemblage supports exchange and transmitted knowledge but does not establish one Andronovo migration or a linear Silk Road.

Event context

Classification

Event type: metallurgical and material interaction

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

Xinjiang is an explicitly requested connected system and the site provides source-backed evidence for eastern technological interaction.

Research notes

  • Provides the technological evidence. Role: provides scientific evidence. Locator: Metallurgical analyses and regional comparison.
  • Documents an influential older model. Role: provides historiography. Locator: Andronovo influence interpretation.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records