What is the evidence?

observation

Letters associated with Ugarit's final decades mention enemy ships and communications involving Alashiya.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1210 BCE–1180 BCE

Precision: approximate

high

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Interpretation and caveats

The correspondence attests perceived maritime danger and diplomatic exchange, but does not identify the attackers or prove a single coordinated invasion of Cyprus and Syria.

Event context

Classification

Event type: diplomatic warning and maritime crisis

Evidence layer: textual

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly links Alashiya to Ugarit's final diplomatic and maritime-security network.

Research notes

  • Documents one strand of Ugarit–Alashiya correspondence. Role: provides textual analysis. Locator: Ugaritic letter and Alashiya trade/diplomacy.
  • Places the letters in their final historical setting. Role: provides textual context. Locator: Ugarit and late eastern Mediterranean crisis.
  • Provides corpus context. Role: provides textual corpus. Locator: Ugaritic Alashiya letters.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records