Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Research assessment

statement

Iron use expanded through multiple local experiments and interregional knowledge pathways rather than one linear diffusion from a single centre.

mechanisms

  • rare-object circulation
  • local smithing experimentation
  • adaptation by bronze-working communities
  • movement of specialists and knowledge

chronology test

Test securely dated production debris and metallographic chaînes opératoires across regions.

geography test

Test whether technological similarities form one spatial wave or several asynchronous clusters.

supporting evidence

  • Uneven early objects
  • continued bronze production
  • regional smelting and smithing differences

important caveat

Multiple pathways does not mean fully independent invention in every region.

Research description

Multiple pathways does not mean fully independent invention in every region.

Evidence and sources

Supporting sources

Contradicting sources

No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.

Other source context

No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.

Where to go next

Referenced records