Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1050 BCE–950 BCE

Precision: approximate

Chronology model: Meyer–Knapp / Knapp comparative phase model

moderate

Conventional broad phase range used for package navigation; local assemblages can cross these boundaries.

Alternative assertion

1050 BCE–950 BCE

Precision: approximate

Chronology model: Conventional Cypro-Geometric I

high

Conventional broad range; local cemeteries and inscriptions can be dated more narrowly or differently.

Research description

Early Cypro-Geometric phase with regionally uneven settlement and mortuary evidence and the possible Opheltas Greek inscription. Alternative ceramic and absolute chronologies are represented as separate date assertions rather than collapsed into one fixed range.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next