relationship · rel_bi_site_bi_salcombe_within_region_bi_southwest_england
rel_bi_site_bi_salcombe_within_region_bi_southwest_england
Salcombe B and related offshore assemblages is researched within the modern analytical frame South-west England archaeological search region; this is not an ancient border or identity assertion.
Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Research description
Salcombe B and related offshore assemblages is researched within the modern analytical frame South-west England archaeological search region; this is not an ancient border or identity assertion.
Evidence and sources
- supports · supports relationship
The Salcombe metal cargoes: New light on the provenance and circulation of tin and copper in Later Bronze Age Europe provided by trace elements and isotopes — Daniel Berger, Quanyu Wang, Gerhard Brügmann, Nicole Lockhoff, Benjamin W. Roberts, Ernst Pernicka (2022)Reanalyses the large Salcombe copper and tin assemblages using trace elements and isotopes to evaluate provenance and circulation.
Locator: Abstract; archaeological objects; analytical results; discussion and conclusions - supports · supports relationship
Copper ingots from a probable Bronze Age shipwreck off the coast of Salcombe, Devon: Composition and microstructure — Quanyu Wang, Stanislav Strekopytov, Benjamin W. Roberts (2018)Analyses 25 copper ingots and selected microstructures from the Salcombe seabed assemblage.
Locator: Abstract; pp. 102–117; provenance discussion - supports · supports relationship
Tin ingots from a probable Bronze Age shipwreck off the coast of Salcombe, Devon: Composition and microstructure — Quanyu Wang, Stanislav Strekopytov, Benjamin W. Roberts, Neil Wilkin (2016)Provides direct compositional and microstructural analysis of the large Salcombe tin-ingot assemblage.
Locator: Abstract; pp. 80–92; discussion and conclusion