Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1600 BCE–1100 BCE

Precision: range

moderate

Absolute dating is explicitly pending; duration may be discontinuous.

  • informs · provides archaeological observation
    A major city of the Kazakh Steppe? Investigating Semiyarka's Bronze Age legacy — Miljana Radivojevic, Dan Lawrence, Victor K. Merz, Ilya V. Merz, Elena Demidkova, Mark Woolston-Houshold, Richie Villis, Peter J. Brown (2025)

    Provides the current site evidence and explicit research questions.


    Locator: Geophysical survey, 140 ha extent and metallurgy

Research description

Earthworks, buildings, slag and tin-bronze production suggest a major aggregation with Cherkaskul and Alekseevka-Sargary materials. The label city remains provisional until excavation and absolute dating test function, population and duration.

Evidence and sources

  • informs · provides archaeological observation
    A major city of the Kazakh Steppe? Investigating Semiyarka's Bronze Age legacy — Miljana Radivojevic, Dan Lawrence, Victor K. Merz, Ilya V. Merz, Elena Demidkova, Mark Woolston-Houshold, Richie Villis, Peter J. Brown (2025)

    Provides the current site evidence and explicit research questions.


    Locator: Geophysical survey, 140 ha extent and metallurgy

Where to go next

Referenced records