secondary_synthesis · src_bienkowski_2022_edom
The Formation of Edom: A Critical Reassessment
Piotr Bienkowski · 2022
Citation metadata
- Type
- journal article
- Publication
- Bulletin of the American Schools of Overseas Research, vol. 388, 177-202
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
Records informed by this source
- causal hypothesis Southern Levant systems-transformation modelEvidence confidence: highinforms · critiques interpretation · polity formation
Chronology caution.
- claim Large-scale Iron Age copper production in the Arabah does not by itself prove control by an early Edomite kingdom.Evidence confidence: very highinforms · critiques interpretation · formation reassessment
Separates industry and polity.
- relationship Edomites — associated population of — EdomEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · critiques interpretation · formation reassessment
Supports dated relationship.
- relationship Pastoral and copper-production networks of the Arabah — not automatically controlled by — EdomEvidence confidence: highinforms · critiques interpretation · formation chronology
Supports guardrail.
- entity EdomitesEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · critiques interpretation · entire article
Separates early copper activity from later Edomite state formation.
- date assertion Emergence of the Edomite polity — date assertionEvidence confidence: lowinforms · critiques interpretation · early formation discussion
Retains but limits this model.
- event Iron Age intensification and reorganization of Arabah copper productionEvidence confidence: highinforms · critiques interpretation · Edom formation reassessment
Challenges automatic Edomite attribution.
- date assertion Edomites — date assertioninforms · critiques interpretation · entire article
Separates early copper activity from later Edomite state formation.
- property assignment Edom — has property — Polity extent uncertainEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · critiques interpretation · formation reassessment
Supports assignment.
- causal hypothesis Polycentric Arabah copper-production modelEvidence confidence: highinforms · critiques interpretation · Edom formation
Political chronology.
- geography assertion Buseirah — geography assertionEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · locates · Edom formation and Buseirah chronology
Supports identification and archaeological location of Buseirah; the point is a representative site locator, not an excavation footprint.
- claim Moab, Ammon, and Edom emerged through different and uneven settlement and political trajectories rather than one synchronous Transjordanian state-formation event.Evidence confidence: highinforms · proposes interpretation · Edom formation
Provides third trajectory.
- entity EdomEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · proposes interpretation · formation model and chronology
Provides current critical synthesis.
- date assertion Edom — date assertioninforms · proposes interpretation · formation model and chronology
Provides current critical synthesis.
- event Emergence of the Edomite polityEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · proposes interpretation · formation chronology and critique
Principal modern reassessment.
- ranked model Moab, Ammon, and Edom formationEvidence confidence: highinforms · proposes interpretation · Edom
Edom trajectory.
- date assertion Emergence of the Edomite polity — date assertionEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · proposes interpretation · formation chronology and critique
Principal modern reassessment.
- date assertion Emergence of the Edomite polity — date assertionEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · proposes interpretation · later formation model
Supports this alternative.
- relationship Buseirah — located in — Edom highlandsEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides archaeological observation · Edom formation and Buseirah chronology
Supports the site description, phase range, or principal research relevance.
- date assertion Buseirah — date assertioninforms · provides archaeological observation · Edom formation and Buseirah chronology
Supports the site description, phase range, or principal research relevance.
- entity BuseirahEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · provides archaeological observation · Edom formation and Buseirah chronology
Supports the site description, phase range, or principal research relevance.
- geography assertion Negev and Arabah — geography assertionEvidence confidence: lowinforms · supports distribution · Edom formation and regional archaeology
Supports a non-state-first reconstruction of the southern Transjordanian landscape.