secondary · src_egyfull_briant_2002
From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire
Pierre Briant · 2002
Citation metadata
- Type
- academic_monograph
- Publication
- Eisenbrauns
- Peer reviewed
- Not specified
Records informed by this source
- event Neo-Babylonian imperial systemEvidence confidence: highinforms · contextualizes transition to persia · Near Eastern imperial transition
Supports wider chronology.
informs · contextualizes transition to Persia · Near Eastern imperial transitionSupports wider chronology.
- date assertion Neo-Babylonian imperial system — date assertionEvidence confidence: highinforms · contextualizes transition to persia · Near Eastern imperial transition
Supports wider chronology.
informs · contextualizes transition to Persia · Near Eastern imperial transitionSupports wider chronology.
- relationship Alexander III — involved or associated with — Alexander III's conquest of EgyptEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides Achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid rule
Supports imperial transition.
supports · provides achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid ruleSupports imperial transition.
- relationship Alexander III's conquest of Egypt — occurred at or involved — MemphisEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides Achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid rule
Supports imperial transition.
supports · provides achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid ruleSupports imperial transition.
- event Alexander III's conquest of EgyptEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides Achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid rule
Supports imperial transition.
supports · provides achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid ruleSupports imperial transition.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides Achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid rule
Supports imperial transition.
- date assertion Alexander III's conquest of Egypt — date assertionEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides Achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid rule
Supports imperial transition.
supports · provides achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid ruleSupports imperial transition.
- relationship Achaemenid administration in Egypt / Dynasty 31 — involved or associated with — Alexander III's conquest of EgyptEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides Achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid rule
Supports imperial transition.
supports · provides achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid ruleSupports imperial transition.
- relationship Macedonian conquest transition — involved or associated with — Alexander III's conquest of EgyptEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides Achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid rule
Supports imperial transition.
supports · provides achaemenid endpoint context · Alexander and the end of Achaemenid ruleSupports imperial transition.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: very highinforms · provides imperial context · Cambyses and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid political context.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides imperial context · Artaxerxes III and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid context.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides imperial context · Artaxerxes III and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid context.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides imperial context · Darius and provincial governance
Supports wider institutional interpretation.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides imperial context · Darius and provincial governance
Supports wider institutional interpretation.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: very highinforms · provides imperial context · Cambyses and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid political context.
- relationship Achaemenid administration in Egypt / Dynasty 31 — involved or associated with — Achaemenid reconquest and Dynasty 31Evidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Artaxerxes III and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid context.
- date assertion Achaemenid reconquest and Dynasty 31 — date assertionEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Artaxerxes III and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid context.
- relationship Darius I's administrative, legal, canal and temple activity in Egypt — occurred at or involved — Kharga OasisEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Darius and provincial governance
Supports wider institutional interpretation.
- date assertion Achaemenid conquest of Egypt — date assertionEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides imperial context · Cambyses and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid political context.
- relationship Darius I's administrative, legal, canal and temple activity in Egypt — occurred at or involved — MemphisEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Darius and provincial governance
Supports wider institutional interpretation.
- date assertion Darius I's administrative, legal, canal and temple activity in Egypt — date assertionEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Darius and provincial governance
Supports wider institutional interpretation.
- relationship Achaemenid reconquest and Dynasty 31 — occurred at or involved — MemphisEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Artaxerxes III and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid context.
- relationship Darius I — involved or associated with — Darius I's administrative, legal, canal and temple activity in EgyptEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Darius and provincial governance
Supports wider institutional interpretation.
- relationship Nectanebo II — involved or associated with — Achaemenid reconquest and Dynasty 31Evidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Artaxerxes III and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid context.
- relationship Achaemenid administration in Egypt / Dynasty 27 — involved or associated with — Darius I's administrative, legal, canal and temple activity in EgyptEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Darius and provincial governance
Supports wider institutional interpretation.
- relationship Achaemenid administration in Egypt / Dynasty 27 — involved or associated with — Achaemenid conquest of EgyptEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides imperial context · Cambyses and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid political context.
- relationship Saite Dynasty 26 state — involved or associated with — Achaemenid conquest of EgyptEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides imperial context · Cambyses and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid political context.
- relationship Cambyses II — involved or associated with — Achaemenid conquest of EgyptEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides imperial context · Cambyses and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid political context.
- relationship Artaxerxes III — involved or associated with — Achaemenid reconquest and Dynasty 31Evidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Artaxerxes III and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid context.
- relationship Temple estates and patronage networks — involved or associated with — Darius I's administrative, legal, canal and temple activity in EgyptEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Darius and provincial governance
Supports wider institutional interpretation.
- relationship Achaemenid reconquest and Dynasty 31 — occurred at or involved — MendesEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Artaxerxes III and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid context.
- relationship Achaemenid conquest of Egypt — occurred at or involved — SaisEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides imperial context · Cambyses and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid political context.
- relationship Achaemenid conquest of Egypt — occurred at or involved — MemphisEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides imperial context · Cambyses and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid political context.
- event Achaemenid reconquest and Dynasty 31Evidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Artaxerxes III and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid context.
- event Achaemenid conquest of EgyptEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides imperial context · Cambyses and Egypt
Supports Achaemenid political context.
- event Darius I's administrative, legal, canal and temple activity in EgyptEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides imperial context · Darius and provincial governance
Supports wider institutional interpretation.
- date assertion Formation and expansion of the Achaemenid Empire — date assertionEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides world context · Cyrus through Alexander
Supports imperial chronology and institutions.
- relationship Achaemenid administration in Egypt / Dynasty 31 — involved or associated with — Formation and expansion of the Achaemenid EmpireEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides world context · Cyrus through Alexander
Supports imperial chronology and institutions.
- relationship Achaemenid administration in Egypt / Dynasty 27 — involved or associated with — Formation and expansion of the Achaemenid EmpireEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides world context · Cyrus through Alexander
Supports imperial chronology and institutions.
- event Formation and expansion of the Achaemenid EmpireEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides world context · Cyrus through Alexander
Supports imperial chronology and institutions.
- claim Achaemenid governance in Egypt must be reconstructed from multilingual evidence and local institutions, not only later anti-Persian narratives.Evidence confidence: highsupports · supports claim · Achaemenid imperial administration
Supports the claim and its qualifications.
- causal hypothesis Achaemenid rule through hybrid imperial and Egyptian institutionsEvidence confidence: highsupports · supports imperial context · Achaemenid provincial governance
Supports empire-wide mechanisms.
- ranked model modelset_egyfull_persian_governancesupports · supports ranking · Achaemenid provincial administration
Provides imperial comparison.
- entity Artaxerxes IIIEvidence confidence: highsupports · supports ruler and reign context · Ruler/period discussion
Supports inclusion, approximate reign and historical significance.
- date assertion Artaxerxes III — date assertionEvidence confidence: highsupports · supports ruler and reign context · Ruler/period discussion
Supports inclusion, approximate reign and historical significance.
- relationship Artaxerxes III — ruled or claimed kingship in — Achaemenid administration in Egypt / Dynasty 31Evidence confidence: highsupports · supports ruler relationship · Ruler and period discussion
Supports kingship assignment and chronology.