secondary_with_primary_archaeological_evidence · src_egyfull_stevens_2016
Tell el-Amarna
Anna Stevens · 2016
Reading ancient testimony
Ask who produced the document, for whom, and for what purpose. Distinguish its ancient creation from its modern edition or translation. Survival and excavation shape what can be read today.
Use the linked edition and reliability notes for the author, audience, transmission and limits of this particular source. Missing information is not an assurance of neutrality.
Document and modern access
- Type
- encyclopedia_article
- Publication
- Not specified
Records informed by this source
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: very highinforms · provides site synthesis · Abstract and urban landscape sections
Directly supports foundation date and urban character.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides urban evidence · Cult, housing and cemeteries
Supports variation between royal programme and lived practice.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides urban evidence · Cult, housing and cemeteries
Supports variation between royal programme and lived practice.
- geography assertion Akhetaten / Tell el-Amarna — geography assertionEvidence confidence: moderatesupports · locates · Tell el-Amarna site location; rounded point
Supports the representative location and named-place identification.
- date assertion Foundation and rapid construction of Akhetaten — date assertionEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides site synthesis · Abstract and urban landscape sections
Directly supports foundation date and urban character.
- event Foundation and rapid construction of AkhetatenEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides site synthesis · Abstract and urban landscape sections
Directly supports foundation date and urban character.
- relationship Foundation and rapid construction of Akhetaten — occurred at or involved — Akhetaten / Tell el-AmarnaEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides site synthesis · Abstract and urban landscape sections
Directly supports foundation date and urban character.
- relationship Royal residence and court — involved or associated with — Foundation and rapid construction of AkhetatenEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides site synthesis · Abstract and urban landscape sections
Directly supports foundation date and urban character.
- relationship Akhenaten — involved or associated with — Foundation and rapid construction of AkhetatenEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides site synthesis · Abstract and urban landscape sections
Directly supports foundation date and urban character.
- relationship Aten-focused royal religious and political change — occurred at or involved — KarnakEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides urban evidence · Cult, housing and cemeteries
Supports variation between royal programme and lived practice.
- date assertion Aten-focused royal religious and political change — date assertionEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides urban evidence · Cult, housing and cemeteries
Supports variation between royal programme and lived practice.
- relationship Akhenaten — involved or associated with — Aten-focused royal religious and political changeEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides urban evidence · Cult, housing and cemeteries
Supports variation between royal programme and lived practice.
- event Aten-focused royal religious and political changeEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides urban evidence · Cult, housing and cemeteries
Supports variation between royal programme and lived practice.
- relationship Aten-focused royal religious and political change — occurred at or involved — Akhetaten / Tell el-AmarnaEvidence confidence: highsupports · provides urban evidence · Cult, housing and cemeteries
Supports variation between royal programme and lived practice.
- claim Ancient Egyptian population totals and regional demographic changes remain highly uncertain.Evidence confidence: highsupports · supports claim · Amarna settlement evidence and limits
Supports the claim and its qualifications.
- claim Akhenaten's Aten-focused programme should not be presented as an instantaneous, universally adopted modern-style monotheism.Evidence confidence: highsupports · supports claim · Amarna urban and household evidence
Supports the claim and its qualifications.
- claim Tombs, temples and royal monuments disproportionately shape the surviving evidence for ancient Egypt.Evidence confidence: near certainsupports · supports claim · Settlement archaeology at Amarna
Supports the claim and its qualifications.
- geography assertion Foundation and rapid construction of Akhetaten — geography assertionEvidence confidence: highsupports · supports geographic assertion · Urban landscape and boundaries
Supports named nodes, control distinctions and uncertainty.
- date assertion Akhetaten / Tell el-Amarna — date assertionEvidence confidence: highsupports · supports site history · Site or regional discussion
Supports the place, phase and interpretive caution.
- entity Akhetaten / Tell el-AmarnaEvidence confidence: highsupports · supports site history · Site or regional discussion
Supports the place, phase and interpretive caution.