secondary_historigraphic_analysis · src_hallote_2020_ancient_near_eastern_canon
The Southern Levant and the Ancient Near Eastern Canon
Rachel Hallote · 2020
Citation metadata
- Type
- book chapter
- Publication
- Oxford University Press
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
Records informed by this source
- myth interpretation Tribal allotments as literary geography rather than surveyed Iron I bordersEvidence confidence: very highinforms · provides source criticism · modern biblical cartography
Documents appropriation risk.
- property Literary geographyEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · history of biblical map frameworks
Documents modern reception risk.
- property Modern appropriation sensitiveEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · chapter 2
Documents disciplinary and political framing.
- entity Southern LevantEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Southern Levant — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Galilee and northern valleysEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Galilee and northern valleys — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Central highlandsEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Central highlands — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Jerusalem and southern highlandsEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Jerusalem and southern highlands — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity ShephelahEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Shephelah — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Southern coastal plain and Philistia research zoneEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Southern coastal plain and Philistia research zone — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Northern coast and Phoenician linksEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Northern coast and Phoenician links — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Negev and ArabahEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Negev and Arabah — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Jordan ValleyEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Jordan Valley — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Moab plateauEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Moab plateau — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Ammon highlandsEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Ammon highlands — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Edom highlandsEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Edom highlands — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Sinai and Egyptian frontierEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Sinai and Egyptian frontier — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Aramean and Syrian connectionsEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Aramean and Syrian connections — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Mediterranean and Assyrian connectionsEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- date assertion Mediterranean and Assyrian connections — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · Chapter 2
Documents how modern geographic and disciplinary frames can shape interpretation.
- entity Tribal allotment geographyEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · provides source criticism · modern map-making and biblical geography context
Explains reception risks.
- date assertion Tribal allotment geography — date assertioninforms · provides source criticism · modern map-making and biblical geography context
Explains reception risks.
- event Composition of biblical tribal-allotment geographiesEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · modern biblical mapping frameworks
Documents reception risk.
- property assignment Tribal allotment geography — has property — Literary geographyEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · modern mapping history
Supports assignment.
- property assignment Israel — has property — Modern appropriation sensitiveEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · modern framing
Supports assignment.
- property assignment Israelite, Judahite, Judean, and Jew terminology — has property — Modern appropriation sensitiveEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · modern framing
Supports assignment.
- property assignment Jerusalem — has property — Modern appropriation sensitiveEvidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · archaeology and modern frameworks
Supports assignment.
- claim Canaan is an ancient geographic and political-cultural label, not proof of one uniform ethnicity, genetic population, language, or state.Evidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · classification history
Shows modern framing risks.
- date assertion Composition of biblical tribal-allotment geographies — date assertionEvidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · modern biblical mapping frameworks
Documents reception risk.
- claim Amarna-era rulers and towns should not be mapped using modern borders, later kingdoms, or biblical tribal allotments.Evidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · modern framing history
Documents mapping bias.
- claim Biblical tribal allotments should be represented first as literary geography, not as default Late Bronze or Iron I political boundaries.Evidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · history of biblical map use
Documents modern mapping risk.
- claim Absence of one expected artifact or text is not, by itself, sufficient proof that a complex biblical tradition is wholly true or wholly false.Evidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · history of archaeological framing
Shows research-bias limits.
- claim Excavation intensity, salvage conditions, later building, publication language, and modern borders strongly shape which southern Levantine sites and communities are visible.Evidence confidence: highinforms · provides source criticism · history of canon formation
Documents disciplinary selection.
- claim Contested or politically sensitive site names should be stored with multiple modern and ancient names, source-specific usage, and no claim of modern sovereignty.Evidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · modern disciplinary and political framing
Supports sensitivity.
- claim Ancient settlement, inscriptions, or religious traditions do not determine present political sovereignty, citizenship, indigeneity, or legitimacy.Evidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · archaeology and modern framing
Documents appropriation history.
- claim Modern Jewish, Palestinian, Israeli, Jordanian, Lebanese, Arab, Christian, Muslim, and other identities cannot be reduced to one ancient genetic, ethnic, or textual lineage.Evidence confidence: near certaininforms · provides source criticism · modern disciplinary frames
Provides historiographic basis.
- relationship Research record — associated withEvidence confidence: very highsupports · provides source criticism · modern biblical cartography
Documents appropriation risk.