primary_material_culture_study · src_hulin_2001_marmaric_wares
Marmaric wares: New Kingdom and later examples
Hulin, Linda · 2001
Reading ancient testimony
Ask who produced the document, for whom, and for what purpose. Distinguish its ancient creation from its modern edition or translation. Survival and excavation shape what can be read today.
Use the linked edition and reliability notes for the author, audience, transmission and limits of this particular source. Missing information is not an assurance of neutrality.
Document and modern access
- Type
- journal_article
- Publication
- Libyan Studies, vol. 32, 67–78
Records informed by this source
- date assertion Tjemehu — date assertioninforms · contextualizes · pp. 67–78
Provides local archaeological material that cannot be equated automatically with the textual label.
- entity TjemehuEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · contextualizes · pp. 67–78
Provides local archaeological material that cannot be equated automatically with the textual label.
- date assertion Zawiyet Umm el-Rakham — date assertioninforms · provides material analysis · pp. 67–78
Publishes local Marmaric fabrics contemporary with the fort.
- relationship Late Bronze Age Marmaric coastal communities — interacted with — Zawiyet Umm el-RakhamEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · provides material analysis · pp. 67–78
Provides local ceramic manufacture evidence.
- entity Zawiyet Umm el-RakhamEvidence confidence: very highinforms · provides material analysis · pp. 67–78
Publishes local Marmaric fabrics contemporary with the fort.
- date assertion Late Bronze Age Marmaric coastal communities — date assertioninforms · supports distribution · pp. 67–78
Defines local fabrics and their New Kingdom distribution.
- entity Late Bronze Age Marmaric coastal communitiesEvidence confidence: moderateinforms · supports distribution · pp. 67–78
Defines local fabrics and their New Kingdom distribution.
- claim Libu, Meshwesh, Tjemehu, and Tehenu should be represented as source-dependent ancient labels, not as fixed ethnic territories.Evidence confidence: highsupports · supports assignment and caveat · pp. 67–78
Provides local archaeology that cannot be equated automatically with an ethnonym.