Emblems and spaces of power during the Argaric Bronze Age at La Almoloya, Murcia

Citation metadata

Type

peer-reviewed journal article

Publication

Antiquity, vol. 95, no. 380, 329–348

Peer reviewed

Yes

Open DOI or stable record (opens in a new tab)

Records informed by this source

• date assertion La Almoloya — date assertion
  informs · provides archaeological observation · pp. 329–348, grave 38 and building discussion

  Provides the excavation evidence and interpretation.

• entity La Almoloya
  Evidence confidence: ◈ high
  supports · provides archaeological observation · pp. 329–348, grave 38 and building discussion

  Provides the excavation evidence and interpretation.

• property Evidence for social stratification
  Evidence confidence: ◈ high
  supports · provides archaeological observation · pp. 329–348

  Provides architecture and grave-goods evidence.

• relationship La Almoloya — classified within — Late El Argar
  Evidence confidence: ◈ high
  supports · provides archaeological observation · pp. 329–348

  Provides the attribution and chronology.

• causal hypothesis Argaric institutional reproduction crisis
  Evidence confidence: ◈ moderate
  supports · supports · pp. 329–348

  Provides strong inequality and political-performance evidence.

• claim La Almoloya supports marked social inequality and political performance but does not by itself define a mapped Argaric kingdom.
  Evidence confidence: ◈ high
  supports · supports · pp. 329–348

  Provides the architecture, grave goods and power interpretation.

• relationship Argaric institutional reproduction crisis — hypothesis about — Terminal transformation of the Argaric institutional system
  Evidence confidence: ◈ moderate
  supports · supports · pp. 329–348

  Provides inequality evidence.

• ranked model model_iberia1_argar_end_ranked
  supports · supports · pp. 329–348

  Provides inequality and power evidence.

• property assignment La Almoloya — has evidence property — Evidence for social stratification
  Evidence confidence: ◈ high
  supports · supports assignment and caveat · pp. 329–348

  The evidence supports differentiated power without fixing a constitutional form or territorial extent.