claim · claim_conquest_not_single_synchronous_wave
Archaeology does not support one synchronous destruction wave matching the full Joshua conquest sequence.
Archaeology does not support one synchronous destruction wave matching the full Joshua conquest sequence.
Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: supported. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Research description
This does not prove that no local conflicts, migrations, or historical memories contributed to the narratives.
Evidence and sources
Supporting sources
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.
Contradicting sources
No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.
Other source context
- informs · dates
The Destruction of Late Bronze Age Hazor — Shlomit Bechar, Amnon Ben-Tor, Ido Wachtel, Daphna Ben-Tor, Elisabetta Boaretto, Philipp W. Stockhammer (2021)Shows one local range.
Locator: Hazor alternatives - informs · dates
The Chronology of Gezer from the End of the Late Bronze Age to Iron Age II: A Radiocarbon Study — Lyndelle C. Webster, and collaborators (2023)Shows separate sequence.
Locator: Gezer chronology - informs · dates
Radiocarbon-Dating the Late Bronze Age: Cultural and Historical Considerations on Megiddo and Beyond — Mario A. S. Martin, Israel Finkelstein, Eli Piasetzky (2020)Shows continuity/change.
Locator: Megiddo sequence - informs · dates
The Renewed Archaeological Excavations at Lachish (1973-1994) — David Ussishkin (2004)Shows different date.
Locator: Lachish sequence