Bronze AgeWorld atlas

claim · claim_egyfull_middle_kingdom_coregencies_disputed

Several proposed Dynasty 12 co-regencies remain disputed and should not be embedded as certain overlaps.

Several proposed Dynasty 12 co-regencies remain disputed and should not be embedded as certain overlaps.

Disputed interpretationConfidence in this assessment: moderateConfidence in the stated assessment
Awaiting expert reviewFuller history of ancient Egypt research expansion
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: contested. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Research description

The package records overlapping reign ranges only where a model requires them and flags them for specialist review.

Evidence and sources

Source roles below relate to the stated assessment, “Disputed interpretation”. Read the source notes to distinguish evidence for an observation from evidence against an explanation.

Supporting sources

  • supports · supports claim
    Ancient Egyptian Chronology — Erik Hornung (editor), Rolf Krauss (editor), David A. Warburton (editor) (2006)

    Supports the claim and its qualifications.


    Locator: Dynasty 12 chronology and co-regencies

Contradicting sources

No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.

Other source context

No source links are recorded for this item in the current release.

Where to go next

Compare the four citiesExplore causes and counter-evidenceExplain a term or date

Referenced records