date assertion · date_jerusalem_early_iron_development_preferred
Date assertion for evt_jerusalem_early_iron_development
Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Evidence and sources
- informs · proposes interpretation
The Contribution of the Amarna Letters to the Debate on Jerusalem's Political Position in the Tenth Century BCE — Nadav Na'aman (1996)Provides one model.
Locator: political-capacity argument - informs · critiques interpretation
The Archaeology of the United Monarchy: An Alternative View — Israel Finkelstein (1998)Provides a counter-model.
Locator: alternative chronology and state scale - informs · contextualizes
The United Monarchy: State of the Question — Zachary Thomas (2016)Summarizes the debate.
Locator: state of the question