What is the evidence?

observation

Letters exchanged between the king of Alashiya and the Egyptian court discuss copper shipments, reciprocity, messengers, plague, and political parity claims.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1360 BCE–1330 BCE

Precision: approximate

very high

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Alternative assertion

1360 BCE–1330 BCE

Precision: range

Chronology model: Standard Amarna chronology

very high

Textual archive range; individual letters belong within this bracket but are not assigned an invented exact year.

Interpretation and caveats

The dossier directly attests a named political authority and large copper exchange; identifying Alashiya with Cyprus is strong but remains a separate archaeological and philological argument.

Event context

Classification

Event type: diplomatic exchange and copper shipment

Evidence layer: textual and archaeometric

Timeline role: cross regional context

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly links the textual polity Alashiya and Cypriot copper systems to New Kingdom Egypt.

Research notes

  • Directly attests the king of Alashiya and copper shipment. Role: provides primary text. Locator: EA 33 transliteration, translation and metadata.
  • Places EA 33 among related texts. Role: provides textual corpus. Locator: Amarna Alashiya dossier.
  • Supports a Cypriot origin and candidate production areas. Role: provides scientific provenance analysis. Locator: Petrography of Alashiya tablets.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records