What is the evidence?

observation

The Kurkh Monolith describes Shalmaneser III fighting a coalition including Damascus, Hamath, and Ahab the Israelite.

proposed causes

    The inscription and named coalition are secure; battle outcome and numerical detail are less certain.

    Inspect the sources →
    Review and provenance

    Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

    Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

    Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

    Chronology

    Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

    Preferred assertion

    853 BCE

    Precision: approximate range

    Chronology model: best current range

    very high

    The inscription and named coalition are secure; battle outcome and numerical detail are less certain.

    Interpretation and caveats

    A major coalition conflict demonstrating ninth-century Israel's participation in Syrian geopolitics; Assyrian army numbers and claimed outcome remain royal rhetoric.

    Event context

    Classification

    Event type: military conflict

    Evidence layer: historical

    Timeline role: cross regional context

    Why it matters to the timeline

    The battle directly connects the kingdom of Israel to Aramean/Syrian coalitions and Assyrian westward expansion.

    Alternative interpretations

    • A decisive Assyrian victory as the inscription claims.
    • A coalition strategic success that temporarily checked Assyrian advance.

    Research notes

    • Critical text edition. Role: provides primary evidence. Locator: RIMA 3 A.0.102.2, Qarqar passage.
    • Provides object identity. Role: locates. Locator: BM 118884.
    • Provides outcome and geopolitical caution. Role: contextualizes. Locator: historical analysis.

    Evidence and sources

    Where to go next

    Referenced records