What is the evidence?

observation

Metalwork associations grouped as Llyn Fawr mark developments around and after the conventional 800 BCE boundary.

observed evidence

Metalwork associations grouped as Llyn Fawr mark developments around and after the conventional 800 BCE boundary.

The transition was regionally variable and should not be treated as one year of technological or population replacement across Britain.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

800 BCE–600 BCE

Precision: typological transition range

Chronology model: regionally resolved positive bce

moderate

Positive BCE integers are used; the larger value is earlier. The range preserves archaeological and calibration uncertainty. The transition was regionally variable and should not be treated as one year of technological or population replacement across Britain.

Interpretation and caveats

The transition was regionally variable and should not be treated as one year of technological or population replacement across Britain.

Event context

Classification

Event type: bronze to iron transition phase

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

This regional contextual event shows the locally defined approach to the Early Iron Age and why 800 BCE is a flexible analytical boundary.

Research notes

  • Provides explicit southern British and Scottish phase tables and cautions that southern British chronology cannot simply be transferred to Scotland. Role: provides evidence and date. Locator: Sections 1.2 and 1.2.5, Tables 1 and 2.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records