event · evt_deuteronomistic_history_redaction
Major composition and redaction phases of the Deuteronomistic History
Deuteronomy through Kings shows linked language, theology, and historical interpretation shaped through debated monarchic, exilic, and post-exilic phases.
What is the evidence?
observation
Deuteronomy through Kings shows linked language, theology, and historical interpretation shaped through debated monarchic, exilic, and post-exilic phases.proposed causes
Literary relationship is substantial; the unity, editions, and dates remain debated.
Inspect the sources →Review and provenance
Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.
Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.
Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.
Chronology
Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.
650 BCE–500 BCE
Precision: broad compositional range
Chronology model: multiple textual critical models
moderateLiterary relationship is substantial; the unity, editions, and dates remain debated.
- informs · defines
Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomistic History — Rannfrid I. Thelle (2022)Provides overview.
Locator: Deuteronomy and Deuteronomistic History models - informs · critiques interpretation
The So-Called Deuteronomistic History — Thomas Römer (2020)Provides alternatives.
Locator: so-called Deuteronomistic History - informs · proposes interpretation
The Double Redaction of the Deuteronomistic History — Richard D. Nelson (2005)Provides one model.
Locator: double-redaction model
Interpretation and caveats
Multiple composition/redaction phases rather than one contemporary chronicle spanning conquest through monarchy.
Event context
Classification
Event type: literary composition and redaction
Evidence layer: literary
Timeline role: regional core
People and places
Locations: Jerusalem and southern highlands, Jerusalem and southern highlands
Why it matters to the timeline
Composition history controls how Exodus, conquest, Judges, monarchy, and divided-kingdom narratives can be used historically.
Alternative interpretations
- A single exilic edition.
- A late-monarchic edition followed by exilic revision.
- Several independent works linked by later editors.
Research notes
- Provides overview. Role: defines. Locator: Deuteronomy and Deuteronomistic History models.
- Provides alternatives. Role: critiques interpretation. Locator: so-called Deuteronomistic History.
- Provides one model. Role: proposes interpretation. Locator: double-redaction model.
Evidence and sources
- informs · defines
Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomistic History — Rannfrid I. Thelle (2022)Provides overview.
Locator: Deuteronomy and Deuteronomistic History models - informs · critiques interpretation
The So-Called Deuteronomistic History — Thomas Römer (2020)Provides alternatives.
Locator: so-called Deuteronomistic History - informs · proposes interpretation
The Double Redaction of the Deuteronomistic History — Richard D. Nelson (2005)Provides one model.
Locator: double-redaction model
Referenced records
- Jerusalem and southern highlands · entity