Bronze Age World

Citation metadata

Type: journal article
Publication: Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, vol. 29, no. 4, 391-400
Peer reviewed: Yes

Open DOI or stable record (opens in a new tab)

Records informed by this source

entity Judges traditions
Evidence confidence: moderate
informs · proposes interpretation · redaction model
Supports multi-stage composition rather than contemporary event reporting.
date assertion Judges traditions — date assertion
informs · proposes interpretation · redaction model
Supports multi-stage composition rather than contemporary event reporting.
entity Deuteronomistic History model
Evidence confidence: moderate
informs · proposes interpretation · double-redaction model
Provides one specific version.
date assertion Deuteronomistic History model — date assertion
informs · proposes interpretation · double-redaction model
Provides one specific version.
event Formation and redaction of Judges traditions
Evidence confidence: moderate
informs · proposes interpretation · redaction model
Provides one editorial sequence.
event Major composition and redaction phases of the Deuteronomistic History
Evidence confidence: moderate
informs · proposes interpretation · double-redaction model
Provides one model.
myth interpretation Judges cycle as theological structuring of local traditions
Evidence confidence: high
informs · proposes interpretation · redaction model
Provides one editorial sequence.
date assertion Formation and redaction of Judges traditions — date assertion
Evidence confidence: moderate
informs · proposes interpretation · redaction model
Provides one editorial sequence.
date assertion Major composition and redaction phases of the Deuteronomistic History — date assertion
Evidence confidence: moderate
informs · proposes interpretation · double-redaction model
Provides one model.
claim Judges may preserve geographically local memories, but its cycle structure and chronology are products of later literary organization.
Disputed interpretationConfidence in this assessment: moderateConfidence in the stated assessment
informs · proposes interpretation · redaction model
Supports layered editing.
claim The Deuteronomistic History is best represented as a debated, multi-stage scholarly corpus model rather than one securely dated authorial work.
Evidence confidence: high
informs · proposes interpretation · double redaction
Provides one model.
relationship Research record — associated with
Evidence confidence: high
supports · proposes interpretation · redaction model
Provides one editorial sequence.