What is the evidence?

observation

Iron working expanded while copper and bronze production continued in altered technical and settlement contexts.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1125 BCE–900 BCE

Precision: approximate

moderate

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Interpretation and caveats

The shift reflects innovation within changing networks rather than a sudden replacement of bronze or cessation of Cypriot copper production.

Event context

Classification

Event type: metallurgical technology transition

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly reconstructs a Cypriot site, landscape, institution, community, or chronological transition within the primary interval.

Research notes

  • Reviews continuing copper and emerging iron practices. Role: provides synthesis. Locator: Metallurgy across LC III–CG.
  • Separates production continuity from export scale. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Long-term copper production.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records