What is the evidence?

observation

Area III technical ceramics document diachronic matte treatment, refining, melting, casting, and recycling, including evidence from Late Cypriot IIIA and probable continued prominence until the end of the twelfth century BCE.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1200 BCE–1100 BCE

Precision: phase based range

Chronology model: Manning 2013 Late Cypriot phase divisions as used by the source

moderate

Late Cypriot IIIA workshop evidence and the authors’ conclusion support continued prominence into the late twelfth century, but not continuous annual operation throughout every year in the range.

Interpretation and caveats

Specialized copper processing at Enkomi continued through the wider regional transformation, showing economic and technological continuity rather than a uniform Cypriot shutdown around 1200 BCE.

Event context

Classification

Event type: metallurgical production continuity

Evidence layer: archaeological

People and places

Locations: Enkomi

Alternative interpretations

  • Continued workshop activity at Enkomi does not by itself prove that one centralized authority controlled all Cypriot copper production or every mining and export stage. (high confidence)

Research notes

  • Provides direct technical evidence and explicitly limits the analysed sample to less than five percent of the site corpus. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Area III levels; results; conclusions.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records