What is the evidence?

observation

The occupied city contracted and was abandoned in the eleventh century BCE after centuries of urban and metallurgical activity.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1075 BCE–1025 BCE

Precision: approximate

high

Preferred display range for this event. It preserves positive BCE ordering and does not suppress narrower contexts or alternative chronology models.

Alternative assertion

1100 BCE–1050 BCE

Precision: approximate

Chronology model: Late LC IIIA–IIIB model

moderate

Broader conventional range for Enkomi's final urban contraction and abandonment.

Alternative assertion

1075 BCE–1025 BCE

Precision: approximate

Chronology model: Resilience synthesis model

high

Later eleventh-century endpoint used to distinguish Enkomi from mid-twelfth-century Hala Sultan Tekke.

Interpretation and caveats

Final abandonment post-dated the better-known circa-1200 BCE disruptions and probably involved regional relocation and institutional reorganization.

Event context

Classification

Event type: urban abandonment and relocation

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

Directly reconstructs a Cypriot site, landscape, institution, community, or chronological transition within the primary interval.

Research notes

  • Places abandonment later than the first transition disruptions. Role: dates and contextualizes. Locator: Enkomi LC IIIB trajectory.
  • Frames abandonment within regional restructuring. Role: provides synthesis. Locator: Enkomi final phases.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records