What is the evidence?

observation

Cremation and urn burial became increasingly prominent in several regions, with local variation in cemetery form, rite and chronology.

Inspect the sources →
Review and provenance

Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

Dataset workflow: proposed. This is separate from specialist review.

Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

Chronology

Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

Preferred assertion

1350 BCE–1000 BCE

Precision: broad range

moderate

Preferred range used by the event. Plausible bounds and alternative models remain explicit rather than averaged.

Interpretation and caveats

Changing funerary practice is treated as social and ritual reorganization that may involve multiple mechanisms. It is not direct proof of an invading Urnfield people.

Event context

Classification

Event type: mortuary practice change

Evidence layer: archaeological

Timeline role: regional core

Why it matters to the timeline

The event directly addresses required burial change and Urnfield terminology within northern and eastern France.

Alternative interpretations

  • Population movement could have contributed in some local cases, but cannot be inferred from rite alone. (low confidence)

Research notes

  • Documents and critically interprets the changing rite. Role: provides archaeological observation. Locator: Mortuary chapters and synthetic critique.
  • Provides wider regional comparison. Role: contextualizes. Locator: Late Bronze Age mortuary synthesis.

Evidence and sources

Where to go next

Referenced records