What is the evidence?

observed evidence

  • H3 tephra
  • Calibrated radiocarbon dating
  • Volcanic deposits

proposed causes

    consequences

      The eruption and broad date are established; Mediterranean climatic impact and tighter dating remain uncertain.

      Inspect the sources →
      Review and provenance

      Specialist reviewer: not recorded. Review date: not recorded.

      Dataset workflow: reviewed for v0.1. This is separate from specialist review.

      Recorded dataset maintenance date: 2026-08-11.

      Confidence describes the stated assessment; it does not certify expert approval. How review works.

      Chronology

      Dating intervals may describe uncertainty or phases; their width alone does not establish event duration.

      Preferred assertion

      1150 BCE–1050 BCE

      Precision: calibrated radiocarbon range

      high

      tephrochronology and calibrated radiocarbon

      Event context

      Properties and assignments

      A label’s definition and the evidence for assigning it here are separate.

      Likely Unrelated to the Initial c.1200 BCE Crisis
      What does this label mean?

      Chronology or mechanism makes the event an unlikely initiator of the main collapse-period developments, though later effects may remain possible.

      Full property definition

      Why does this record have this property?

      The currently preferred Hekla 3 date is too late to initiate most destructions and political failures clustered around the turn of the twelfth century BCE.

      highStatus: accepted

      Evidence and sources

      Where to go next

      Referenced records